Last  year, I was all about James Starks, Chris Ivory, Danny Woodhead and  basically all the Bucs not named Earnest Graham. I'll be updating my  mancrush list on a  weekly basis, but we need a starting point for 2011. These are the guys  that for whatever reason I'm absolutely fixated on to start the season  (not counting the studs we know will be studs):
Matt  Stafford. Again, Aaron Rodgers-esque breakout coming. It's going to be  fun to watch. Nate Burleson and Titus Young also qualify for this list.  The Lions are actually my Buccaneers for this season, even though Jahvid  Best scares the bejesus out of me for a variety of good and bad  reasons.
Mike Tolbert. Barring injury, I just can't fathom a  scenario whereby Tolbert fails to score 10 fantasy points in any given  game. Probably never gonna get to 20, but I can live with 10 every week.  That's Steven Jackson territory.
Brandon Jacobs. Tolbert Junior (errrr, Senior.) Enough touches to do consistent damage every week, and for a much lower price  than his  tandem partner Bradshaw.
Julio Jones. Yes, it is possible  that he outproduces Roddy White in his rookie year. Unlikely, yes, but  possible. I think it will at least be close when all is said and done,  and I think both will finish in the top 15. Think Miles Austin and Dez  Bryant.
Jimmy Graham. After Gates and Finley, there's no one I  think will be more explosive at the position this year. I'm even  starting to look at him ahead of Finley.
Dexter  McCluster. The chuckles I've heard on this one suggest I could just  have easily have said "Donald Brown" I don't know why, I just think the  guy's gonna be a gamer this year, and I love his dual position  eligibility a la Woodhead. I basically envision him as exactly what  Woodhead was last year, producing as a WR3 with the added benefit of  being used as an RB in an emergency. This  is  the one guy on my list that has any chance of being available on your  waiver wire, and it's actually very likely that he is. Go get him, and  send me a Thank You card later. (On second thought, it may take him til  midseason to make a difference, just like Woodhead, so perhaps you can  wait on that......)
On Manning
I  can't recall an injury that has more dramatically affected more player  values than this one. It's like the Pearl Harbor, the JFK assassination  or the 9/11 of fantasy football.* (Where were you when you heard that  Manning could be out for the year?) Wayne, Collie and Garcon have all  been postulated to be demoted at least 1-2 full tiers in the fantasy  ranks. They're talking about going run-heavy, which would be suicide for  the way this team is built. Might as well start talking to Andrew Luck  now about his rookie  contract. No, I  think they stay the course for the most part. Collins is no Manning,  for sure, but he can get the job done. Wayne is an elite receiver,  Collie is a gamer as evidenced by last season, and Garcon is steady if  not spectacular. And any schmo QB would love an inside weapon like  Clark. If not for the pressure of filling a massive void, Collins would  be entering a QB's dream scenario.
And what about that run game  that they may turn to? Though no big play threat, Joseph Addai is about  as good as they come in terms of patience, humility, pass blocking and  outlet availability, so total number of goalline touches is about the  only thing he takes a hit on, simply because they won't be down there as  much. He actually may benefit in terms of number of touches but does  have a TD vulture looking over his shoulder in Delone Carter, who  probably isn't rostered in most leagues anyway and would need to show  quite an immediate and explosive breakout ability to have  fantasy relevance this year. He's the guy that  would have to do it if they're going to go run, and I just don't see  it, though there have been occasional comparisons to MJD. Donald Brown  is still there, but he's still lousy. Ditto Anthony Gonzalez in the  passing game, but you just never know. A whole lot of wildcards  sometimes equals a royal flush.
* I'm torn about having NFL  Opening Day coincide with the 10th anniversary of 9/11. A big part of me  thinks it is truly fitting, stick it to the terrorists by continuing to  do what we love in spite of their actions. We will not be terrorized.  We will not sacrifice our way of life out of fear. At the same time, I  think the date should be solemnized, particularly the 10th anniversary  of the tragedy. I honestly believe September 11 should be made an annual  national holiday of remembrance. And you could put a positive spin on  it by calling it Patriots Day or National Heroes Day or the like, while  still making a clear acknowledgement  of the  victims. I think playing football is among the most American things you  could possibly do, so I think it's a great idea to go on with the  games. It's just a little tougher to get into the spirit of it this year  on the benchmark anniversary. I will be passionately monitoring my  fantasy teams on Sunday, but not without a much heavier heart than  usual. And it has nothing to do with having Peyton Manning on one of my  teams.
Sneaky plays of the week
You're  in trouble if you're already looking for a plug-and-play, but here's  this week's top options for guys that were not likely drafted as  starters, and my crazy projections for each:
Kerry  Collins: 250 passing yards, 3 TD, 2 INT. Seriously. This will be a  high-scoring game and his receiving crew is among the best in the  league.Ben Tate and Derrick Ward: 50+  all-purpose yards each, whether or not Foster plays (but not sure which will score)
Michael Bush: 75 yards and one TD plunge. Double that if DMC goes down before halftime as expected.
Julio Jones: 8+ receptions, 100+ yards, 1 long TD. Welcome to the NFL!
Nate Burleson: 75+ yards and one touchdown, mostly because four guys were covering Megatron on the play.
Aaron Hernandez: 60+ yards and 1 TD. I think Gronkowski has a good chance to get one as well, but fewer receptions and yardage.
San Francisco DST: 3 turnovers and one defensive touchdown while shutting down what Seattle euphemistically calls its "offense"
There's eight options listed here. If  I get two right, I'm  doing OK. Anything over three and I'm a flippin' genius!
Suicide/Survivor
Like  every year, week 1 is going to be tough, but this year it seems even  tougher. And that should ensure you lose half the pool after the first  week, my favorite aspect of these types of pools. I've been doing the  same one for about five years, and actually won the whole thing once.  Four out of five times, I've gone deep into the season, following a few  simple guidelines for as long as I possibly can:
1) Always pick a home team. Home teams in the NFL win 70 percent of the time. Huge statistical advantage.
2)  Avoid underdogs (for obvious reasons) and close spreads (3 points or  less). The oddsmakers have a pretty good idea what one team's  chances are of beating another, so it's prudent to avoid those matches  in which they don't waver far from even.
3) Avoid national telecasts  and upper-end division rivalries. Generally, the intensity gets ramped  up in these games and weird things happen to both teams. Unfortunately,  that's true of every game in Week One, but obviously you have to pick  someone.
4) Avoid betting on a weak team, especially early in the  season, simply because you think their opponent is weaker and you want  to save the better teams for later. It's not going to help you to have  New England left in Week 10 if you get eliminated in Week 2. Go with the  surer things and worry about your more critical choices later. In Week  2, you have no idea what any team is really going to be worth come Week  10.
5) Avoid betting for or against Oakland. Probably the least predictable team in the NFL.
Following  those rules, I'm left ONLY with Kansas City (hosting Buffalo) and San  Diego (hosting Minnesota) for Week One. Special mention goes to Houston  (hosting Indy) which the oddsmakers have heavily favored because  Manning is out. I'm not so sure the Texans take this one. It IS an  intense rivalry, and you can bet the entire Indy squad will be motivated  to prove they can succeed without their star. Furthermore, Foster may  sit, or at least be limited. I'm not saying the Colts WILL win, I'm just  saying there's a good enough chance they MIGHT win that I don't want to  bet against it.
Either KC or San Diego works this week, but I'm  slightly more confident that San Diego will win, so I'm going with  them. And by the way, the worst bet this week, violating all of my  rules, would be Oakland. But I wouldn't be at all surprised if the  Raiders won.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment